Empowering Voices: The UI Inter-Hall Debate Competition and the Art of Public Speaking

By: AFỌLÁBÍ E. Simisólá

An inter-hall debate competition recently took place, organized by Asido, with the aim of educating people about the importance of mental health. Before delving into the details, it's crucial to understand that public speaking plays an integral role in enlightening the general public about pressing societal issues and ensuring that advocacy and justice are served.

The competition occurred on the 16th of September and featured an oratory contest focused on mental health literacy, examining the past, present, and future. Surprisingly, Awo emerged as the winner, defeating Kuti Hall with a 25.83% lead. One might have expected Kuti, the winner of the previous Jaw War Hall round, to have an advantage, but this outcome highlights the unpredictability of debates, especially after a large percentage of veteran speakers recently graduated from the hall.

Good day, Mr. Chairman, the panel of judges, accurate timekeeper, and fellow debaters.... That's not how public speaking or an intellectual debate should proceed. If you were to do this on any UI public speaking stage, you'd likely face boos, and we might even question your student status.

Bello Hall undoubtedly boasts great speakers, evident from their victory over Zik Hall by a margin of 2 points. A glimpse of Jaw War's final round held last session is a testament to their skills, though not fully there yet. However, Bello Hall still faces challenges in gaining visibility in some key university activities. As for Zik Hall, while they are known for their noise, which to a considerable measure is earned, it is clear that their prowess doesn't extend to public speaking, and that noise holds nothing.

Independence Hall qualified for the finals as a result of  Queen Elizabeth II Hall's absence. Also, Lord Tedder Hall qualified for the finals as a result of the absence of Queen Idia Hall. Will Lord Tedder maintain its status in public speaking, or will they focus on being cafeteria champions despite their historical strength in public speaking? Only time will reveal the answer.

Queen Idia and Queen Elizabeth II Hall did not participate in the competition. The reasons behind Queen Idia's absence are a matter of curiosity, while Queen Elizabeth II Hall's absence raises concerns about their track record.

A 400-level Queenite expressed disappointment stating that Queens Hall was not represented and hopes for better performances in future competitions.

A freshman, unfamiliar with UI's public speaking modalities beyond secondary school debates, shared that she is excited about witnessing Queens Hall excel in various competitions, and not just debates.

A finalist expressed optimism that Queens Hall, despite a lackluster history in debate competitions, can perform better this year. She also mentioned her eagerness to attend her last Jaw War with Queens Hall represented by exceptional speakers.

Looking ahead to the final stage of the competition on the 30th of this month at Trenchard Hall, the anticipation is palpable. This event will not only determine this year's winners but also set the compass for the hall with the greatest stamina in public speaking. Beyond being a competition, public speaking, literacy, and intellectual debate are skills that every Uite should possess, regardless of their department, hall or faculty. As a new season unfolds, it's essential to be part of this revolution. Public speaking offers more than just banter; it delves into profound matters.

In conclusion, the absence of certain halls, such as Queen Idia and Queen Elizabeth II Hall, raises questions about commitment and legacy. Halls have unique identities and histories, and their participation in events like these is an opportunity to shape their narrative positively. Queen Elizabeth II Hall, in particular, must confront its track record and find a way to rekindle its competitive spirit. A resurgence in public speaking could breathe new life into their legacy.